Rhetoric in Composition and Communication:
historical contexts and national trends in undergraduate curricula
              Thomas P. Miller tpm@u.arizona.edu   Homepage: http://www.gened.arizona.edu/tmiller/default.html

Communications and English majors in a stratified sample of 100 4-year institutions
Rhetoric courses offered in a stratified sample of 100 4-year institutions
What's going on with English majors?  (presentation at CCCC with more research on English majors)
  • What are the purposes of studying english and communications?

  • What is an english major about, besides literature?

  • What is a communications major?

  • How rhetorical are english and communications majors?

  • What is studied in more rhetorically-oriented majors in the sample?

  • Other interdisciplinary alternatives for rhetorical studies?

  •                 Download a printer-friendly Word copy of this paper.            (If the formatting has problems, email me.)

                Discussions of how rhetoricians in English and communications can work more closely together have focused on shared areas of study.  In considering such possibilities, it is important to look past prevailing models of disciplines as distinct areas of scholarship to examine the pragmatics of what practitioners do.  The distinction between fields of study and fields of work is particularly important in considering the assumptions and purposes of rhetorical studies.  On both sides of the modern divide between the arts and sciences, rhetoric is concerned with the pragmatics of discourse--with the situational constraints, collective purposes, and political assumptions that shape the conditions and consequences of ideas and practices, including those that define rhetoric itself.  Assuming such a perspective can help us to reflect upon the potentials of work with rhetoric in communications and English studies.

                 In one of the more notable attempts to foster collaborations between rhetoricians in communications and English departments, the Alliance of Rhetoric Societies’ Conference on the Status and Future of Rhetorical Studies, one of the four sets of questions set for the discussion concerned teaching: “What does it mean to teach rhetoric?  What does it mean to teach composition and performance seriously?  What is the relationship between rhetoric and composition?  Should they be distinguished?” (http://www.comm.umn.edu/ARS/).  A couple of points in these framing questions bear note: it is assumed that the parallel to composition in communications is “performance,” but that parallel is apparently not strong enough to support the following line of questioning, which focuses on only one of the two disciplinary points of reference.  The responses of the participants from communications and English departments are interesting in a predictable way because those in communications tend to treat rhetoric as a theoretical and critical art, and the others largely identify rhetorical studies with the teaching of composition.

                 Such tendencies arise from the disciplinary locations and locutions that shape what rhetoric has come to be about in communications and English departments.  The two fields of work have historically defined each other in ways that bear note.  On one side of the arts and sciences, rhetoric has been defined by the dominance of literary studies, and on the other by social science methodologies.  The divisions run through the types of work done in the fields.  In English, rhetoric’s identification with composition was marginalized when rhetoricians concerned with public address and journalism left the area, leaving composition and “creative writing” as polar opposites without journalistic genres and other forms of public discourse to mediate between them.  In communications, the  identification of rhetoric with speech came to be compounded by a tendency to define rhetorical theory by classical models.  These tendencies have been called into question by the technological changes that have undermined the traditional functions of English departments as bastions of the culture of the book, and the interdisciplinary trends that are identified with cultural studies have opened up possibilities to redress institutional divisions.  For that to occur, we need to attend to the differing functions and institutional dynamics in the two fields of work. Some of those differences can be noted by taking account of enrollments in the decades when rhetoric and composition were reestablished in English departments and the comparative graduate and undergraduate enrollments today:

                return to top

     Degrees in English, Communications and Selected Disciplines

    Discipline

           1970-1

            BAs

            1980-1

            BAs

           1990-1

            BAs

          2000-1

          BAs

        2000-1 

       Masters

          2000-1

       Doctorates

      Total...............

    839,730

    935,140

        1,094,538

    1,244,171

      542,010

    44,904

    Business....

    114,729

    198,983

    249,311

    265,746

       116,475

    1180

    Communications...........

    10,324

    29,428

    51,650

    58,013

           5,218

    368

    Communications technologies..................

    478

    1,854

    1,123

    1,050

             533

    2

    Computer and info sciences ...................

    2,388

    15,121

    25,083

    41,954

         16,038

    768

    Education ............

    176,307

    108,074

    110,807

    105,566

       145,104

    6716

    English lang and lit/letters ....................

    64,342

    32,254

    51,841

    51,419

           6,941

    1,506

    Psychology.............

    38,187

    41,068

    58,655

    73,534

         15,196

              4,659

     

    Table drawn up from tables 252 and 257 from the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System,  (http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/tables/dt252.asp; and http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d02/tables/dt257.asp)

     

                return to top


    What are the purposes of studying english and communications?


     

    Selected Mission Statements:

    Lake Erie College

    WHAT IS THE COMMUNICATIONS MAJOR?

    This major provides students with courses both in writing processes and in the history and theory of different forms of communication. This double focus is based on the belief that the processes of oral and written communication must be grounded in substantive understanding of their theoretical and historical backgrounds.

    WHAT IS THE ENGLISH MAJOR?

    The major in English is directed towards the student who seeks a background in British and American literature as the basis of study in the liberal arts or who wishes to pursue graduate studies in this field. Students may also wish to combine courses in English with a major in another field such as History or Communications.      (http://www.lec.edu/academics/academ1.html)

     

    Communication and Culture Department, Indiana University

    The Department of Communication and Culture (CMCL) advances the study of communication as a cultural practice, and teaches an array of perspectives that enable students to prepare broadly for a variety of careers. Requirements for the major and minor are flexible in order to promote individualized programs of study in three interrelated aspects of communication: rhetoric, media, and performance and ethnographic studies.

    Rhetorical studies orient students to the strategic dimension of human communication associated with deliberation, advocacy, and persuasion in a variety of social, political, and professional settings. Studies of media focus primarily on film and television, with additional emphasis on topics such as radio, recorded music, and interactive digital technologies. Performance and ethnographic studies explore an array of communicative practices, from the conversations and disputes of everyday life to artful performances at cultural events, which are the competencies essential for participation in social life. It also brings intercultural and transnational considerations into focus by examining how diversity and differences of various kinds are negotiated across boundaries. Together, these three dimensions examine linkages among corporate, social, and governmental organizations, ideology, and politics, showing how communication influences public cultures across the globe. They provide a strong grounding in the history, theory, production, and critique of communication that ranges from interpersonal dialogue, storytelling, and presentational speaking to film and television. http://www.indiana.edu/~bulletin/iub/coas/comm.html#course

    Department of English, Appalachain State University

    The Department of English has as its most fundamental goal helping all students to develop literacy and analytical skills that will lead to life long learning.  . . . [W]e strive to help students become literate, articulate, and open-minded, qualities that are the hallmarks of a liberal education.  The study of literature and the exploration of language and writing – the primary activities in the Department of English – are critical elements to liberal education.  One way the department contributes to the achievement of a liberal education is through its freshman writing and literature series, where we strive to help students understand the function and power of language and appreciate our shared literary heritage. . . . 

    The Department of English serves those students who seek to become teachers of literature and writing as well as those who wish to enter graduate and professional education in literature and writing.  We also serve those students who wish to develop their writing and other communication skills for career planning in business and industry. . . .                  http://www.english.appstate.edu/mission.html

    Communications Program offered by Depts. of English and Art and Visual Culture, Centenary College

          Communicating successfully in our technology-infused world requires a combination of strong speaking and writing skills as well as an in-depth understanding of visual and interactive modes of expression such as photography, film and multimedia. Centenary communication majors explore all of these areas through a rich body of courses that approach human communication as a cultural and social phenomenon.

         Our project-oriented curriculum challenges students to draw on their broad liberal arts education and their own creativity to address the types of problems communication professionals face regularly. In writing and production courses such as Writing for the Mass Media, Video and Film Production, and Multimedia Design, professors work closely with students to help them learn skills and develop strategies necessary for producing creative, effective media texts. Similarly, professors in courses such as History of Photography and Cyberculture provide opportunities for students to investigate the relationship between media and culture; in so doing, student develop analytical skills crucial to understanding how media texts influence and are, in turn, influences by society. The major culminates in the Senior Seminar in which students prepare for their job or graduate school search by creating electronic portfolios that feature the best examples from the communication projects begun in their courses, internships, community service, and campus media work.

         The communication curriculum is designed to give students experience with a wide range of media while also allowing them to concentrate their major coursework in the medium that best corresponds to their personal and professional goals. After getting a broad introduction to communication studies students pursue one of three tracks: professional writing, film/television/video, or new media.

    http://www.centenary.edu/majors/communication/

                return to top

     

    What is an english major about, besides literature?

    A series of national studies of undergraduate English programs were undertaken by the MLA beginning in 1984, including a survey of over five hundred two-year and four-year institutions in 1991.  Two thirds of all undergraduate courses were in writing, half were in composition, and one quarter were in literature.  While the percentages were higher in public than in private institutions (67% vs. 49%), 60% of all respondents said that computers were used in at least some writing classes, with only 13% noting their use in literature classes.  With respect to English education, most departments responded that they supported such offerings, and almost twenty percent responded that they were working to expand them, while another quarter responded that they received little attention.

    Requirements and majors varied by the size and types of institutions.  Many large institutions (more than 15,000) had more wide-ranging requirements, but such departments were less likely than either mid-sized public institutions or departments with joint programs to require linguistics, the history of language, rhetoric, and general or advanced writing courses.  Huber speculates that this pattern may be due to the fact that these courses were required in English education majors, and there clearly was a broad concern for raising the disciplinary base of education majors. The following statistics are based on a sample of over 300 departments:

     

     

    Percentages of Majors Requiring Writing and Language Courses

     

    by type of departments

     

    Joint
    Programs Depts.

    Separate English Depts.

     

    Midsized
    Public

    Small
    Private 

    Very Large

     

    Writing

    45.3

    33.8

    23.3

      26.9

     

    Lang, ling, and rhetoric

    32.8

    30.8

    10.0

      17.9

     

    Adv. Comp or writing

    58.3

    57.4

    29.6

      34.2

     

    History of English

    or comparative grammar

    62.5

    48.5

    23.2

      35.4

               

               Bettina Huber. “Undergraduate English Programs: Findings from an MLA  

              Survey of the 1991-1992 Year.” ADE Bulletin 115 (Winter 1996): 34-73

     

    While most departments (56%) offered concentrations in more than literature, the percentages increase with the size of the institution, with 71.1% of institutions of more than 15,000 having other majors, 58.6% of institutions with 2,000 to 15,000, and 38.9% of those with fewer than 2,000 students.

    Percentage of Departments Offering Courses in 1989-­91

    Courses Offered

    2 Yr

    4 Yr

    All

    Composition

    97.4

    95.6

    96.2

    Creative Wrtg

    74.4

    89.6

    84.5

    Develop English

    88.5

    63.2

    70.6

    Prof/ tech wrtg

    57.7

    65.4

    63.2

    Upper-level Comp/rhet

    0.0

    79.7

    55.5

    Journalism

    52.6

    36.5

    41.4

    Rhet/comp theory

    9.0

    40.1

    30.9

    Am lit survey

    81.4

    86.8

    85.1

    Brit lit survey

    71.8

    81.9

    78.8

    World lit survey

    60.3

    60.7

    60.9

    Shakespeare

    37.2

    97.3

    78.8

    Chaucer

    0.6

    72.5

    50.8

    Milton

    0.0

    56.6

    39.3

    Other single- or dual author 

    2.6

    45.9

    32.6

    Genre courses

    48.1

    82.4

    71.6

    Period courses

    14.1

    75.8

    57.1

    Lit crit/ theory

    1.3

    74.2

    52.1

    History Engl lang

    3.2

    69.0

    49.0

    Lit analysis

    0.6

    27.7

    19.5

    Women writers

    33.3

    71.2

    59.4

    Ethnic/minority lit

    24.4

    69.0

    55.3

    Film or film &lit

    40.4

    61.5

    55.2

    Linguistics

    5.8

    50.0

    36.6

    Myth/folklore

    23.7

    42.3

    36.5

    Speech

    51.3

    23.4

    32.1

    Comparative grammar

    3.8

    34.9

    25.4

      Number of depts.

    156

    364

    524

    Percentages of Concentrations in Departments Offering Concentrations

    Area of Concentration

    1991-­92

    1884-­85 

    Literature (general)

    72.2

    ­

    Creative writing

    54.6

    56.9

    Writing (e.g., professional, technical)

    45.9

    29.2

    English education

    42.8

    57.4

    American literature

    31.4

    ­

    Communications (e.g., journalism, speech, drama)

    20.1

    25.2

    Linguistics

    13.4

    19.3

     

     

     

    For related research and further analysis, see “What’s going on with English majors?” at  http://www.gened.arizona.edu/tmiller/ccc.htm


                return to top

    What is a communications major?

    As defined by the Department of Education, Communications studiesmodes and behavioral aspects of human communications and the formal means by which society organizes communication. 

             Comparatively less research has been done on communications majors, which vary much more widely than programs of study in English.  While English majors have begun to expand beyond traditional conceptions of literature, in part as a result of the influence of cultural studies, communications do not have a traditional set of core concerns and vary from media studies or mass communications through communication skills programs to departments and colleges stressing journalism, broadcasting, or the performing arts.  Many such disciplinary configurations may have rhetorical sources or associations, but very few foreground them as a shared background for the programs of study.

    The most detailed study of communications curricula that I know of is June H. Smith and Patricia H. Turner’s “Survey of Communication Department Curriculum in Four-Year Colleges and Universities” in the Journal of Association for Communication Administration (1993) 1: 34-49, which surveyed the course catalogues of 856 respondents (for a response rate of 50% of the1712 institutions they identified).  Smith and Turner set out to survey curricula and then use the results to assess how well students were being prepared for the skills that they would need in the jobs that communications graduates typically enter in business, education, and health and social science work. From prior studies, Smith and Turner set out a skills inventory for communications majors: “interpersonal communication, small group meetings, interviewing, understanding of theory, organizational communication patterns, persuasion, and public speaking” (35). 

                Smith and Turner’s study of the curricula of 856 institutions found that 79.6% of the institutions have a communications studies department, which in 67% of the cases used communications rather than speech to identify the discipline. Departments in institutions with more than 10,000 students were far less likely to give multiple degrees, with less than 17% offering multiple degrees, as compared to 40% of those with enrollments between 1,000 and 5,000, which according to Smith and Turner tend to be “multi-disciplinary departments offering the most diverse degree options” (45).  Speech and “communications arts” departments were also less likely to have multiple majors than those designated communications departments.

    The 682 departments in Smith and Turner’s sample also gave degrees in

  • Drama 35%,

  • Radio/TV 41%,

  • Journalism 33%,

  • Public Relations 26%,

  • Advertising 24%, and others.

  • The most offered courses:

  • Public Speaking 81%,

  • Intro to Broadcasting 67%,

  • Interpersonal Com. 67%,

  • Survey 66%,

  • Practicum 66%,

  • Oral Interpretation 60%,

  • Debate 57%,

  • TV/Production 57%

  • Organizational Com 53%,

  • Communication Theory 53%,

  • Public Relations 53%,

  • Radio/Production 50%,

  • Rhetoric/Public Address 48%,

  • Broadcasting News 47%,

  • Persuasion 42%, and

  • Group Communications 42%.

  • Another survey of course offerings is provided by William Wardrope’s “Reflections on Undergraduate Communication Education: A Curricular Profile of U.S. Communications Departments” in Communication Education (1999): 256-9.  Using the National Communications Association directory of 420 departments, Wardope studied 148 responding departments (35%).  Perhaps because of the vagaries of characterizing courses, or because of evolving trends, Wardrope found these to be the most commonly offered courses:

  • Interpersonal Com 71.6%

  • Group Discussion 68.2%

  • Communication Theory 66.2%

  • Organizational Communication 66.2%

  • Public Speaking 64.1%

  • Persuasion 64.1?

  • Argumentation and Debate 60.8%

  • Multicultural Communication 54.7%

  • Communication Research Methods 50%